Content by CompareCards
In my view, there is no way to understand American politics without understanding the role race has played. Slavery, the Civil War, Reconstruction, Jim Crow, the civil rights movement, and the election of Barack Obama have uniquely shaped our national identity. Given the abundance of scholarship and literature on race, I suggest that writers use our complicated past as a template for writing about the power dynamics between different groups in the future. There is so much material to explore—so much truth to mine.
For starters, you may want to simply think about transporting Barack Obama and Donald Trump to some far-off futuristic world and see where your imagination takes you. There are too many books to recommend on race and I am by no means an expert. But I will mention three that have influenced my thinking on what racial divides might look like in the future: Putting the Science in Fiction: Locke had a more optimistic view of human nature.
Humans are endowed with natural rights and they enter into a social contract to protect these rights. This centuries-old debate animates current Democrat and Republican arguments over the role of government. Conservative Republicans Hobbesians generally favor law and order, economic liberty, and higher military spending. Liberal Democrats Lockeans generally favor civil liberties and greater economic equality. Writers should ask themselves what their futuristic governments will look like.
Current debates over military spending, economic equality, and civil rights will certainly have their place in futuristic narratives. We could put Rosa Parks, Susan B. I would suggest reading the biography of a woman who changed the course of American history Harriet Tubman: The Road to Freedom by Catherine Clinton is a good one and use her to model the behavior of a hero in a futuristic setting.
I would take the qualities of this real-life hero, and based on them, build a challenging futuristic political environment for her to overcome. No personal attacks, shill accusations, hate-speech, flaming, baiting, trolling, witch-hunting, or unsubstantiated accusations. Threats of violence will result in a ban. Do not post users' personal information. Users who violate this rule will be banned on sight. Witch-hunting and giving out private personal details of other people can result in unexpected and potentially serious consequences for the individual targeted.
Vote based on quality, not opinion. Political discussion requires varied opinions. Well written and interesting content can be worthwhile, even if you disagree with it. Do not manipulate comments and posts via group voting. Manipulating comments and posts via group voting is against reddit TOS. Articles must deal explicitly with US politics. See our on-topic statement here.
Articles must be published within the last calendar month. Submissions must be from domains on the whitelist. The whitelist and its criteria can be found here. Post titles must be the exact headline from the article. Your headline must be comprised only of the exact copied and pasted headline of the article.
Submissions must be an original source. An article must contain significant analysis and original content--not just a few links of text among chunks of copy and pasted material. Content is considered rehosted when a publication takes the majority of their content from another website and reposts it in order to get the traffic and collect ad revenue.
Articles must be written in English An article must be primarily written in English for us to be able to moderate it and enforce our rules in a fair and unbiased manner. Submissions must be articles, videos or sound clips. We disallow solicitation of users petitions, polls, requests for money, etc.
Welcome to Reddit, the front page of the internet.
Super bowl 51 scores by quarter | Nba sportsbook reddit | Fantasy basketball tips yahoo | Badminton scoring system 2018 | 419 sports scores | Online sports betting business plan |